vulnerability
Amazon Linux 2023: CVE-2025-38632: Important priority package update for kernel6.12
| Severity | CVSS | Published | Added | Modified |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | (AV:L/AC:M/Au:M/C:N/I:N/A:C) | Aug 22, 2025 | Sep 30, 2025 | Dec 4, 2025 |
Severity
4
CVSS
(AV:L/AC:M/Au:M/C:N/I:N/A:C)
Published
Aug 22, 2025
Added
Sep 30, 2025
Modified
Dec 4, 2025
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
pinmux: fix race causing mux_owner NULL with active mux_usecount
commit 5a3e85c3c397 ("pinmux: Use sequential access to access
desc->pinmux data") tried to address the issue when two client of the
same gpio calls pinctrl_select_state() for the same functionality, was
resulting in NULL pointer issue while accessing desc->mux_owner.
However, issue was not completely fixed due to the way it was handled
and it can still result in the same NULL pointer.
The issue occurs due to the following interleaving:
cpu0 (process A) cpu1 (process B)
pin_request() { pin_free() {
mutex_lock()
desc->mux_usecount--; //becomes 0
..
mutex_unlock()
mutex_lock(desc->mux)
desc->mux_usecount++; // becomes 1
desc->mux_owner = owner;
mutex_unlock(desc->mux)
mutex_lock(desc->mux)
desc->mux_owner = NULL;
mutex_unlock(desc->mux)
This sequence leads to a state where the pin appears to be in use
(`mux_usecount == 1`) but has no owner (`mux_owner == NULL`), which can
cause NULL pointer on next pin_request on the same pin.
Ensure that updates to mux_usecount and mux_owner are performed
atomically under the same lock. Only clear mux_owner when mux_usecount
reaches zero and no new owner has been assigned.
pinmux: fix race causing mux_owner NULL with active mux_usecount
commit 5a3e85c3c397 ("pinmux: Use sequential access to access
desc->pinmux data") tried to address the issue when two client of the
same gpio calls pinctrl_select_state() for the same functionality, was
resulting in NULL pointer issue while accessing desc->mux_owner.
However, issue was not completely fixed due to the way it was handled
and it can still result in the same NULL pointer.
The issue occurs due to the following interleaving:
cpu0 (process A) cpu1 (process B)
pin_request() { pin_free() {
mutex_lock()
desc->mux_usecount--; //becomes 0
..
mutex_unlock()
mutex_lock(desc->mux)
desc->mux_usecount++; // becomes 1
desc->mux_owner = owner;
mutex_unlock(desc->mux)
mutex_lock(desc->mux)
desc->mux_owner = NULL;
mutex_unlock(desc->mux)
This sequence leads to a state where the pin appears to be in use
(`mux_usecount == 1`) but has no owner (`mux_owner == NULL`), which can
cause NULL pointer on next pin_request on the same pin.
Ensure that updates to mux_usecount and mux_owner are performed
atomically under the same lock. Only clear mux_owner when mux_usecount
reaches zero and no new owner has been assigned.
Solutions
amazon-linux-2023-upgrade-bpftool6-12amazon-linux-2023-upgrade-bpftool6-12-debuginfoamazon-linux-2023-upgrade-kernel6-12amazon-linux-2023-upgrade-kernel6-12-debuginfoamazon-linux-2023-upgrade-kernel6-12-debuginfo-common-aarch64amazon-linux-2023-upgrade-kernel6-12-debuginfo-common-x86-64amazon-linux-2023-upgrade-kernel6-12-develamazon-linux-2023-upgrade-kernel6-12-headersamazon-linux-2023-upgrade-kernel6-12-libbpfamazon-linux-2023-upgrade-kernel6-12-libbpf-debuginfoamazon-linux-2023-upgrade-kernel6-12-libbpf-develamazon-linux-2023-upgrade-kernel6-12-libbpf-staticamazon-linux-2023-upgrade-kernel6-12-modules-extraamazon-linux-2023-upgrade-kernel6-12-modules-extra-commonamazon-linux-2023-upgrade-kernel6-12-toolsamazon-linux-2023-upgrade-kernel6-12-tools-debuginfoamazon-linux-2023-upgrade-kernel6-12-tools-develamazon-linux-2023-upgrade-kernel-livepatch-6-12-46-66-121amazon-linux-2023-upgrade-perf6-12amazon-linux-2023-upgrade-perf6-12-debuginfoamazon-linux-2023-upgrade-python3-perf6-12amazon-linux-2023-upgrade-python3-perf6-12-debuginfo
NEW
Explore Exposure Command
Confidently identify and prioritize exposures from endpoint to cloud with full attack surface visibility and threat-aware risk context.