How AI Shapes Modern Cybersecurity
See how AI systems work, where they excel, and why they introduce new security challenges.
How adversarial AI works
At the core of every ML model is a set of patterns learned from training data. The model compares new inputs against those patterns to make predictions. Adversarial AI exploits this process by crafting inputs that appear normal to humans but push the model toward the wrong answer.
This works because most models operate in extremely high-dimensional space. A tiny perturbation that looks like noise to a human can dramatically shift a model’s interpretation. Similarly, if an attacker has the opportunity to influence the data a model learns from, they can shape its understanding long before it makes real-world decisions.
Although adversarial AI and adversarial ML are closely related, adversarial AI typically refers to the practical use of these techniques in attacking deployed systems.
Types of adversarial AI attacks
There are many adversarial AI attack methods threat actors are capitalizing on. Let’s look through a few more common techniques:
- Evasion attacks occur after a model is deployed. An attacker modifies an input so slightly that a human might not notice anything unusual, yet the model’s output changes dramatically.
- Poisoning attacks target the training stage, shifting how the model interprets future data.
- Model extraction means attackers reconstruct a model’s logic by repeatedly querying it.
- Prompt-based attacks on large language models (LLMs) enable attackers to craft prompts or embed instructions that steer large language models toward unsafe or unintended outputs.
- Adversarial perturbations are small, precisely engineered changes designed to mislead a model.
Real-world risks and impacts
Although adversarial AI may seem small or abstract, the consequences are concrete.
- Systems that rely on computer vision can be fooled by strategically altered images.
- Fraud detection tools may miss high-risk transactions when attackers manipulate behavioral signals.
- Content moderation systems can be bypassed with carefully modified text or imagery.
- Even biometric authentication has been shown to be susceptible to synthetic adversarial inputs.
What makes adversarial AI particularly challenging is that attacks do not require compromising the underlying infrastructure. A model can behave incorrectly even when the system around it is perfectly secure. This expands the effective attack surface and introduces new failure modes that traditional controls are not equipped to detect.
Understanding the root causes of adversarial vulnerabilities
Adversarial vulnerabilities don’t arise solely from an attacker’s ingenuity; they emerge from the underlying structure of modern AI systems. Machine learning models operate in high-dimensional mathematical spaces and make predictions by approximating patterns rather than reasoning explicitly about meaning or context. This gives them remarkable capability, but introduces fragility.
Several foundational characteristics contribute to the adversarial susceptibility of AI systems:
- Dependence on statistical correlations: Models learn patterns that often work well in everyday scenarios but may be misleading in edge cases. Attackers exploit this by creating inputs that disrupt those correlations in subtle ways, causing the model to “see” something entirely different.
- Generalization beyond training data: Because models must interpret data they’ve never encountered before, they are most vulnerable at the boundaries of what they understand. Adversarial inputs often push models into these ambiguous regions, where incorrect predictions are more likely.
- Complex and opaque architectures: Deep neural networks contain millions or even billions of parameters. Small shifts in training data, preprocessing choices, or environmental conditions can meaningfully affect how these systems behave under pressure, making it difficult for developers to anticipate every possible failure.
These properties make adversarial weaknesses a structural challenge rather than a simple implementation flaw. The result is that defending against adversarial AI requires continuous testing, monitoring, and adaptation.
Detecting and defending against adversarial AI
There is no single threat detection solution that eliminates adversarial risk. Instead, the most cyber resilient organizations adopt a layered strategy that strengthens the model, the data, and the operational environment around it.
One foundational approach is model hardening. Techniques such as adversarial training expose a model to manipulated inputs during development, strengthening its resilience. Other methods, including input filtering, regularization, and gradient masking, aim to reduce how sensitively a model reacts to subtle distortions.
Visibility also plays a critical role. Monitoring systems can track how inputs and outputs drift over time, detect anomalies, and trigger review when behavior deviates from expectations. This mirrors the observability practices used elsewhere in a modern security operations center (SOC).
A growing number of teams use AI red-teaming to evaluate models before deployment. By simulating real attack behavior, they can uncover weaknesses in classification logic, prompt handling, or contextual reasoning. These exercises often reveal issues that are invisible through ordinary testing.
Finally, compliance and human oversight remain crucial. Documenting model assumptions, understanding how decisions are made, and introducing human review for high-impact scenarios help ensure adversarial manipulation does not silently influence sensitive processes.
Adversarial AI vs. traditional cyberattacks
Traditional cyberattacks exploit vulnerabilities in software, infrastructure, or user behavior. Adversarial AI attacks, by contrast, exploit the model itself. They may require no privileged access, no malware, and no breach of sensitive systems. A single crafted input can be enough to cause an incorrect prediction.
Because adversarial AI exploits statistical behavior rather than code defects, defenders must think differently. Risk modeling, testing, and continuous evaluation become as important as patching or hardening infrastructure.
Future trends: How adversarial AI is evolving
Adversarial AI is advancing alongside the systems it targets. As models grow more capable, interconnected, and widely deployed, adversarial techniques are becoming both more sophisticated and more accessible. One emerging trend is the use of generative models to automate attack creation, enabling adversaries to craft large volumes of tailored adversarial inputs without deep technical expertise.
Another trend is the blending of traditional cyberattacks with adversarial manipulation. In the past, attackers often needed system access to cause meaningful disruption. Now, they can influence outcomes simply by shaping the data an AI system consumes – whether that data comes from user inputs, sensors, public datasets, or integrated third-party feeds.
Related reading
Explore Rapid7's Exposure Management Product
Rapid7 Accelerates Exposure Remediation with AI-Generated Risk Insights
What Is AI Risk Management in Cybersecurity?
What is Dark AI? Risks, Examples & Defense Strategies