In this week’s Whiteboard Wednesday, Joe Busch, sales engineer for Rapid7, talks about red teams, blue teams, and the latest concept of “hunt teams.”
Many security professionals are familiar with the concept of red (attack) and blue (defense) teams, and participate in security scenario exercises to test existing defenses and improve security preparedness. Hunt teams, which tend to be more specialized and sophisticated, have come about more recently with the growing focus on incident detection and response.
Watch the video to get a full understanding of the details, strengths, and differences across each type of team, and how they might fit into your security program.
Welcome to this week's Whiteboard Wednesday, my name is Joe Busch, I'm a senior security sales engineer here at Rapid7. This week we are going to be talking about Red teams, Blue teams and Hunt teams. What are they and what are the differences? There is a lot different terms floating around the security industry these days. I think most people have heard of some these but we are going to go through the differences and see where each sits. Before we dive into that, the concepts behind these different teams out there kind of originate with the military. Red Teams are the concept of doing a test exercise with a live fire exercise with different groups. Blue Team would be the defending force and the Red Team would be the attacking force. The whole idea was to test concepts and poke holes on different misconceptions that organizations might have about how they are doing offense or defense. That has all been taken and subsumed by different industries and security industry is no different here. In the security industry world, we've taken the idea of a Red team to be an offensively based team. These are folks doing offensive security, a proactive attacking of networks, infrastructure or code, depending on the part of environment that we are going after. This is a penetration testing role. We want to think of these as people with very specific skills on the offensive side of the house, and it's something that not every organization has the internal capability for. Organizations might be using different offensive software, catalytic distributions and things like that, or they might use consultants from the outside world to take care of these sort of thing for them. PCI for example requires penetration testing methodologies and organizations sometimes do it themselves, sometimes outsource that activity.
Show more Show lessSee how InsightIDR can help you detect intruders earlier in the attack chain.
Watch Demo